Articles with public access mandates - Holger Schünemann, MD, PhD, MSc, FRCPC - Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchLearn more
NoteFor this mandate, articles should be available from specific locations.
Not available based on mandate: 19
Review
A new taxonomy is proposed for defining the interests of stakeholders’ representatives in health research: the case of guideline development
EA Akl, J Khabsa, HJ Schünemann, E Tomlinson, R Parker, P Tugwell, ...
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 160, 147-150, 2023
Review
Equity Issues Rarely Addressed in the Development of COVID-19 Formal Recommendations and Good Practice Statements
O Dewidar, M Bondok, L Abdelrazeq, K Aliyeva, K Solo, V Welch, ...
Review
STUDY PROTOCOL
R Charide, L Stallwood, M Munan, S Sayfi, L Hartling, NJ Butcher, ...
Review
Methods to summarize discrete-choice experiments in a systematic review: A Scoping review
D Choudhary, M Thomas, K Pacheco-Barrios, Y Zhang, P Alonso-Coello, ...
The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 15 (6), 629-639, 2022
Review
Serious reporting deficiencies exist in minimal important difference studies: current state and suggestions for improvement
A Carrasco-Labra, T Devji, A Qasim, M Phillips, BC Johnston, ...
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 150, 25-32, 2022
Review
Racialised people in clinical guideline panels
N Persaud, M Ally, H Woods, A Workentin, NN Baxter, A Boozary, ...
The Lancet 399 (10320), 139-140, 2022
Review
A taxonomy and framework for identifying and developing actionable statements in guidelines suggests avoiding informal recommendations
T Lotfi, A Hajizadeh, L Moja, EA Akl, T Piggott, T Kredo, MW Langendam, ...
Journal of clinical epidemiology 141, 161-171, 2022
Review
Minimal important difference estimates for patient-reported outcomes: a systematic survey
A Carrasco-Labra, T Devji, A Qasim, MR Phillips, Y Wang, BC Johnston, ...
Journal of clinical epidemiology 133, 61-71, 2021
Review
Conclusions from surveys may not consider important biases: a systematic survey of surveys
N Santesso, AM Barbara, R Kamran, S Akkinepally, J Cairney, EA Akl, ...
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 122, 108-114, 2020
Review
GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—Risk of bias and indirectness
Y Zhang, P Alonso-Coello, GH Guyatt, JJ Yepes-Nuñez, EA Akl, ...
Journal of clinical epidemiology 111, 94-104, 2019
Review
GRADE Guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences–Inconsistency, Imprecision, and other Domains
HJ Schünemann, PA Coello
Review
Global differences in lung function by region (PURE): an international, community-based prospective study
ML Duong, S Islam, S Rangarajan, K Teo, PM O'Byrne, HJ Schünemann, ...
The lancet Respiratory medicine 1 (8), 599-609, 2013
Review
How to use an article reporting a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis
EJ Mills, JPA Ioannidis, K Thorlund, HJ Schünemann, MA Puhan, ...
Jama 308 (12), 1246-1253, 2012
Review
Clinical practice guidelines and patient decision aids. An inevitable relationship
T van der Weijden, A Boivin, J Burgers, HJ Schünemann, G Elwyn
Journal of clinical epidemiology 65 (6), 584-589, 2012
Review
Barriers and potential solutions toward optimal prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis for hospitalized medical patients: a survey of healthcare professionals
NS Lloyd, JD Douketis, J Cheng, HJ Schünemann, DJ Cook, L Thabane, ...
Journal of hospital medicine 7 (1), 28-34, 2012
Review
Reporting of research: Are we in for better health care by 2020?
H Schünemann, D Ghersi, J Kreis, G Antes, J Bousquet
Review
GRADE system: new paradigm
L Terracciano, J Brozek, E Compalati, H Schünemann
Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology 10 (4), 377-383, 2010
Review
The diagnosis of myocardial infarction in critically ill patients: an agreement study
W Lim, A Tkaczyk, P Holinski, I Qushmaq, M Jacka, V Khera, ...
Journal of critical care 24 (3), 447-452, 2009
Review
Quality of professional society guidelines and consensus conference statements in critical care
T Sinuff, RV Patel, NKJ Adhikari, MO Meade, HJ Schünemann, DJ Cook
Critical care medicine 36 (4), 1049-1058, 2008
Available based on mandate: 43
Review
Protocol for the development of guidance for collaborator and partner engagement in health care evidence syntheses
P Tugwell, V Welch, O Magwood, A Todhunter-Brown, EA Akl, ...
Systematic Reviews 12 (1), 134, 2023
Publication and funding information is determined automatically by a computer program