Authors
Jeanne-Marie Guise, Mary Anna Denman, Cathy Emeis, Nicole Marshall, Miranda Walker, Rongwei Fu, Rosalind Janik, Peggy Nygren, Karen B Eden, Marian McDonagh
Publication date
2010/6/1
Source
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume
115
Issue
6
Pages
1267-1278
Publisher
LWW
Description
OBJECTIVE:
To systematically review the evidence about maternal and neonatal outcomes relating to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).
DATA SOURCES:
Relevant studies were identified from multiple searches of MEDLINE, DARE, and the Cochrane databases (1980 to September 2009) and from recent systematic reviews, reference lists, reviews, editorials, Web sites, and experts.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:
Inclusion criteria limited studies to the English-language and human studies conducted in the United States and developed countries specifically evaluating birth after previous cesarean delivery. Studies focusing on high-risk maternal or neonatal conditions, including breech vaginal delivery, or fewer than 10 patients were excluded. Poor-quality studies were not included in analyses.
Total citations
201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024102228314739444531343030442818
Scholar articles
JM Guise, MA Denman, C Emeis, N Marshall, M Walker… - Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
JM Guise, MA Denman, C Emeis, N Marshall, M Walker… - Obstetric Anesthesia Digest, 2011