Authors
Jay P Singh, Sarah L Desmarais, Cristina Hurducas, Karin Arbach-Lucioni, Carolina Condemarin, Kimberlie Dean, Michael Doyle, Jorge O Folino, Verónica Godoy-Cervera, Martin Grann, Robyn Mei Yee Ho, Matthew M Large, Louise Hjort Nielsen, Thierry H Pham, Maria Francisca Rebocho, Kim A Reeves, Martin Rettenberger, Corine de Ruiter, Katharina Seewald, Randy K Otto
Publication date
2014/7/3
Journal
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
193-206
Publisher
Routledge
Description
Mental health professionals are routinely called upon to assess the risk of violence presented by their patients. Prior surveys of risk assessment methods have been largely circumscribed to individual countries and have not compared the practices of different professional disciplines. Therefore, a Web-based survey was developed to examine methods of violence risk assessment across six continents, and to compare the perceived utility of these methods by psychologists, psychiatrists, and nurses. The survey was translated into nine languages and distributed to members of 59 national and international organizations. Surveys were completed by 2135 respondents from 44 countries. Respondents in all six continents reported using instruments to assess, manage, and monitor violence risk, with over half of risk assessments in the past 12 months conducted using such an instrument. Respondents in Asia and South …
Total citations
20142015201620172018201920202021202220232024115374036374332463918
Scholar articles