Authors
Kyle S Van Houtan, Stuart L Pimm, John M Halley, Richard O Bierregaard Jr, Thomas E Lovejoy
Publication date
2007/3
Journal
Ecology letters
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
219-229
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Description
Many ecologists believe birds disappear from tropical forest fragments because they are poor dispersers. We test this idea using a spatially explicit capture data base from the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project near Manaus, Brazil. We measure bird movements directly, over relatively large scales of space and time, both before and after landscape fragmentation. We found that species which disappear from fragments move extensively between plots before isolation, but not after, and often disperse to longer distances in continuous forest than in fragmented forest. Such species also preferentially emigrate from smaller to larger fragments, showing no preference in continuous forest. In contrast, species that persist in fragments are generally less mobile, do not cross gaps as often, yet disperse further after fragmentation than before. ‘Heavy tailed’ probability models usually explain dispersal kernels better …
Total citations
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320246101516192015162116201613161317125
Scholar articles