Authors
Irene Cheung, Lorne Campbell, Etienne P LeBel, Robert A Ackerman, Bülent Aykutoğlu, Šteˇpán Bahník, Jeffrey D Bowen, Carrie A Bredow, Christopher Bromberg, Peter A Caprariello, Rodrigo J Carcedo, Kevin J Carson, Rebecca J Cobb, Nancy L Collins, Conrad A Corretti, Theresa E DiDonato, Chelsea Ellithorpe, Noelia Fernández-Rouco, Paul T Fuglestad, Rebecca M Goldberg, Frank D Golom, E Gündoğdu-Aktürk, Lisa B Hoplock, Petr Houdek, Heidi S Kane, John S Kim, Sue Kraus, Christopher T Leone, Norman P Li, Jill M Logan, Roanne D Millman, Marian M Morry, Jennifer C Pink, Taylor Ritchey, LM Root Luna, H Colleen Sinclair, Danu Anthony Stinson, Tamara A Sucharyna, Natasha D Tidwell, AHMET Uysal, Marek Vranka, Lauren A Winczewski, Jose C Yong
Publication date
2016/9
Journal
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
750-764
Publisher
Sage Publications
Description
Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, and Hannon (2002, Study 1) demonstrated a causal link between subjective commitment to a relationship and how people responded to hypothetical betrayals of that relationship. Participants primed to think about their commitment to their partner (high commitment) reacted to the betrayals with reduced exit and neglect responses relative to those primed to think about their independence from their partner (low commitment). The priming manipulation did not affect constructive voice and loyalty responses. Although other studies have demonstrated a correlation between subjective commitment and responses to betrayal, this study provides the only experimental evidence that inducing changes to subjective commitment can causally affect forgiveness responses. This Registered Replication Report (RRR) meta-analytically combines the results of 16 new direct replications of the original …
Total citations
201520162017201820192020202120222023202412125414898105
Scholar articles
I Cheung, L Campbell, EP LeBel, RA Ackerman… - Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2016