Authors
Nina Springer, Ines Engelmann, Christian Pfaffinger
Publication date
2015/7/3
Journal
Information, Communication & Society
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
798-815
Publisher
Routledge
Description
User comments allow ‘annotative reporting’ by embedding users’ viewpoints within an article's context, providing readers with additional information to form opinions, which can potentially enhance deliberative processes. But are these the only reasons why people comment on online news and read these comments? This study examines factors that motivate, or demotivate and constrict, such participation by surveying nearly 650 commenters, lurkers, and non-users in Germany. From a normative perspective, the results are ambivalent. The results show that commenters are driven by social-interactive motives to participate in journalism, and to discuss with other users. However, the data suggest that commenters do not obtain cognitive gratifications to the desired extent. Presumably, their exchange is socially and not deliberatively motivated. Reading comments is fuelled by both cognitive and entertainment motives …
Total citations
20152016201720182019202020212022202320247122235314842583119
Scholar articles
N Springer, I Engelmann, C Pfaffinger - Information, Communication & Society, 2015