Authors
Amy H Butler, Alberto Arribas, Maria Athanassiadou, Johanna Baehr, Natalia Calvo, Andrew Charlton‐Perez, Michel Déqué, Daniela IV Domeisen, Kristina Fröhlich, Harry Hendon, Yukiko Imada, Masayoshi Ishii, Maddalen Iza, Alexey Yu Karpechko, Arun Kumar, Craig MacLachlan, William J Merryfield, Wolfgang A Müller, Alan O'Neill, Adam A Scaife, John Scinocca, Michael Sigmond, Timothy N Stockdale, Tamaki Yasuda
Publication date
2016/4
Journal
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Volume
142
Issue
696
Pages
1413-1427
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Description
Using an international, multi‐model suite of historical forecasts from the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) Climate‐system Historical Forecast Project (CHFP), we compare the seasonal prediction skill in boreal wintertime between models that resolve the stratosphere and its dynamics (‘high‐top’) and models that do not (‘low‐top’). We evaluate hindcasts that are initialized in November, and examine the model biases in the stratosphere and how they relate to boreal wintertime (December–March) seasonal forecast skill. We are unable to detect more skill in the high‐top ensemble‐mean than the low‐top ensemble‐mean in forecasting the wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation, but model performance varies widely. Increasing the ensemble size clearly increases the skill for a given model. We then examine two major processes involving stratosphere–troposphere interactions (the El Niño/Southern Oscillation …
Total citations
2016201720182019202020212022202320245921181491889
Scholar articles