Authors
Andrew J Charlton‐Perez, Mark P Baldwin, Thomas Birner, Robert X Black, Amy H Butler, Natalia Calvo, Nicholas A Davis, Edwin P Gerber, Nathan Gillett, Steven Hardiman, Junsu Kim, Kirstin Krüger, Yun‐Young Lee, Elisa Manzini, Brent A McDaniel, Lorenzo Polvani, Thomas Reichler, Tiffany A Shaw, Michael Sigmond, Seok‐Woo Son, Matthew Toohey, Laura Wilcox, Shigeo Yoden, Bo Christiansen, François Lott, Drew Shindell, Seiji Yukimoto, Shingo Watanabe
Publication date
2013/3/27
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Volume
118
Issue
6
Pages
2494-2505
Description
We describe the main differences in simulations of stratospheric climate and variability by models within the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) that have a model top above the stratopause and relatively fine stratospheric vertical resolution (high‐top), and those that have a model top below the stratopause (low‐top). Although the simulation of mean stratospheric climate by the two model ensembles is similar, the low‐top model ensemble has very weak stratospheric variability on daily and interannual time scales. The frequency of major sudden stratospheric warming events is strongly underestimated by the low‐top models with less than half the frequency of events observed in the reanalysis data and high‐top models. The lack of stratospheric variability in the low‐top models affects their stratosphere‐troposphere coupling, resulting in short‐lived anomalies in the Northern Annular Mode, which do …
Total citations
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241183030422332523031202317
Scholar articles
AJ Charlton‐Perez, MP Baldwin, T Birner, RX Black… - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2013