Authors
Richard Frankham, Jonathan D Ballou, Michele R Dudash, Mark DB Eldridge, Charles B Fenster, Robert C Lacy, Joseph R Mendelson III, Ingrid J Porton, Katherine Ralls, Oliver A Ryder
Publication date
2012/9/1
Source
Biological Conservation
Volume
153
Pages
25-31
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
The ∼26 definitions of species often yield different numbers of species and disparate groupings, with financial, legal, biological and conservation implications. Using conservation genetic considerations, we demonstrate that different species concepts have a critical bearing on our ability to conserve species. Many species of animals and plants persist as small isolated populations suffering inbreeding depression, loss of genetic diversity, and elevated extinction risks. Such small populations usually can be rescued by restoring gene flow, but substantial genetic drift effects can lead them to be classified as distinct species under the diagnostic phylogenetic species concept. Minimum harm to fitness is done and maximum potential fitness and evolutionary potential benefits accrue when reproductive isolation (pre- and/or post-zygotic) is used as the criterion to define distinct species. For sympatric populations, distinct …
Total citations
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202411183229332034284228262712
Scholar articles
R Frankham, JD Ballou, MR Dudash, MDB Eldridge… - Biological Conservation, 2012