Authors
Philippe Thunis, Alain Clappier, Leonor Tarrasón, Cornelis Cuvelier, A Monteiro, Enrico Pisoni, Joost Wesseling, CA Belis, G Pirovano, Stijn Janssen, Cristina Guerreiro, Emanuela Peduzzi
Publication date
2019/9/1
Journal
Environment International
Volume
130
Pages
104825
Publisher
Pergamon
Description
Information on the origin of pollution constitutes an essential step of air quality management as it helps identifying measures to control air pollution. In this work, we review the most widely used source-apportionment methods for air quality management. Using theoretical and real-case datasets we study the differences among these methods and explain why they result in very different conclusions to support air quality planning. These differences are a consequence of the intrinsic assumptions that underpin the different methodologies and determine/limit their range of applicability. We show that ignoring their underlying assumptions is a risk for efficient/successful air quality management as these methods are sometimes used beyond their scope and range of applicability. The simplest approach based on increments (incremental approach) is often not suitable to support air quality planning. Contributions obtained …
Total citations
20192020202120222023202412324182919
Scholar articles