Authors
N Zoe Hilton, Angela M Carter, Grant T Harris, Amilynn JB Sharpe
Publication date
2008/2
Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
171-188
Publisher
Sage Publications
Description
Actuarial risk assessments yield valid numerical information about violence risk, but research suggests that forensic clinicians prefer to communicate risk using nonnumerical information (i.e., verbal terms such as high risk). In an experimental questionnaire study, 60 forensic clinicians disagreed on the interpretation of nonnumerical terms, and their nonnumerical risk estimates for one group of violent offenders were influenced by comparison with another group. Adding nonnumerical terms to numerical probability statements had no effect on hypothetical forensic decisions. These findings suggest that nonnumerical descriptive terms do not aid effective communication of violence risk and that contextual information might artificially affect estimated risk.
Total citations
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320243586129121418710788783
Scholar articles