Authors
Matthias Stucki, Sybille Büsser, René Itten, Rolf Frischknecht, Holger Wallbaum
Publication date
2011/11
Journal
ESU-services Ltd. commissioned by European Association for Geosynthetic Manufacturers (EAGM), Uster and Zürich, CH
Description
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Geosynthetics versus Conventional Construction Materials ii assessments. However, uncertainty due to variability in gravel density and in matching the thickness of the layers (95% interval of+/-7%, or about+/-3.5 cm for a 50 cm gravel layer) or of transport services required (95% interval of about+ 100%/-50%) is taken into account. Sensitivity analyses are carried out to further explore the reliability of the results. On one hand the thickness of the filter is varied in case 1 taking into account different technical specifications. On the other hand four alternatives for road foundations are analysed in case 2. This includes 2 alternative road foundations using reinforcement with geosynthetics and two alternatives for the stabilisation of the road using cement or quick lime only.
Total citations
201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024325432243235
Scholar articles
M Stucki, S Büsser, R Itten, R Frischknecht… - ESU-services Ltd. commissioned by European …, 2011