Authors
Timo Idema, Daniel Kelemen
Publication date
2006
Journal
Perspectives on European Politics and Society
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
108-123
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Description
Many academic analysts have greeted EU efforts to promote ‘new modes of governance’ including the Open Method of Co-ordination (OMC) with enthusiasm. Most of the literature on EU governance suggests that the introduction of new modes of governance is desirable and that the OMC and other new modes of governance are likely to play a greater role in EU governance in the future. We challenge this view of the OMC and other ‘new’ modes of governance. The current significance and likely future impact of such modes of governance has been greatly exaggerated. The OMC and new modes of governance more generally are red herring that distract attention from the more important and pervasive increase in the formality and judicialisation of EU policy making. While we agree that the idealised model of the OMC might be desirable in many respects, we question the conceptual underpinnings of this hopeful …
Total citations
20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220231551018172091211138545853