Authors
Jocelyn E Mendoza, Digby Elliott, Daniel V Meegan, James L Lyons, Timothy N Welsh
Publication date
2006/4
Journal
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
413
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Description
Two experiments used Müller–Lyer stimuli to test the predictions of the planning-control model (S. Glover, 2002) for aiming movements. In Experiment 1, participants aimed to stimuli that either remained the same or changed upon movement initiation. Experiment 2 was identical except that the duration of visual feedback for online control was manipulated. The authors found that the figures visible during movement planning and online control had additive effects on endpoint bias, even when participants had ample time to use visual feedback to modify their movements (Experiment 2). These findings are problematic not only for the planning-control model but also for AD Milner and MA Goodale's (1995) two visual system explanation of illusory bias. Although our results are consistent with the idea that a single representation is used for perception, movement planning, and online control (eg, VH Franz, 2001), other …
Total citations
20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024124116433221332322122
Scholar articles
JE Mendoza, D Elliott, DV Meegan, JL Lyons… - … of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and …, 2006