Authors
Clare Williams, Priscilla Alderson, Bobbie Farsides
Publication date
2002/2/1
Journal
Social science & medicine
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
339-347
Publisher
Pergamon
Description
Partly in order to dissociate itself from eugenics, genetic counselling values the principle of nondirectiveness as a key feature. Recent reports have upheld the importance of this approach, treating it unproblematically. However, doubts have been expressed about whether nondirective counselling is possible or indeed, desirable. Changes in organisational aspects of antenatal screening delivery in the UK have meant that genetic counselling is now being carried out by a variety of practitioners other than counsellors and specialists. These are often practitioners such as obstetricians and midwives who, in many other aspects of their work do not practise in a nondirective way. This paper explores some of the difficulties health practitioners encountered when attempting to work nondirectively. Reasons given by practitioners for not following this approach fell into categories, which in turn formed a continuum. Categories …
Total citations
200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024295777139811912151187881074241
Scholar articles