Authors
Bernhard Wolfslehner, Harald Vacik, Manfred J Lexer
Publication date
2005/3/7
Journal
Forest ecology and management
Volume
207
Issue
1-2
Pages
157-170
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
Over the previous decade, sustainable forest management (SFM) has become a highly relevant topic both in forest and environmental policy. Criteria and indicators (C&I) are primarily used in implementing the principles of SFM at national, regional, and at forest management unit levels. In turning SFM from a conceptual framework into applicable guidelines at the operational scale, several limitations have to be acknowledged: (i) partial lack of knowledge, (ii) deficits about dependencies and feedbacks among system components represented by C&I, and (iii) knowledge gaps regarding impacts and related uncertainties. Several methodologies have been proposed to implement C&I-based SFM. Multi-criteria analysis is often used to analyze and evaluate multiple C&I approaches. This study compares two different multi-criteria analysis approaches: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with a hierarchical structure and …
Total citations
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320243611211729243024323018263231201315113