Authors
JV Headley, KM Peru, MH Mohamed, RA Frank, JW Martin, RRO Hazewinkel, D Humphries, NP Gurprasad, LM Hewitt, DCG Muir, D Lindeman, R Strub, RF Young, DM Grewer, RM Whittal, PM Fedorak, DA Birkholz, R Hindle, R Reisdorph, X Wang, KL Kasperski, C Hamilton, M Woudneh, G Wang, B Loescher, A Farwell, DG Dixon, M Ross, A Dos Santos Pereira, E King, Mark P Barrow, B Fahlman, J Bailey, DW McMartin, CH Borchers, CH Ryan, NS Toor, HM Gillis, L Zuin, G Bickerton, M McMaster, E Sverko, D Shang, LD Wilson, FJ Wrona
Publication date
2013/8/24
Source
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A
Volume
48
Issue
10
Pages
1145-1163
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Group
Description
This article provides a review of the routine methods currently utilized for total naphthenic acid analyses. There is a growing need to develop chemical methods that can selectively distinguish compounds found within industrially derived oil sands process affected waters (OSPW) from those derived from the natural weathering of oil sands deposits. Attention is thus given to the characterization of other OSPW components such as oil sands polar organic compounds, PAHs, and heavy metals along with characterization of chemical additives such as polyacrylamide polymers and trace levels of boron species. Environmental samples discussed cover the following matrices: OSPW containments, on-lease interceptor well systems, on- and off-lease groundwater, and river and lake surface waters. There are diverse ranges of methods available for analyses of total naphthenic acids. However, there is a need for inter …
Total citations
2013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241101617141515161112104
Scholar articles