Authors
Lena Maier-Hein, Matthias Eisenmann, Annika Reinke, Sinan Onogur, Marko Stankovic, Patrick Scholz, Tal Arbel, Hrvoje Bogunovic, Andrew P Bradley, Aaron Carass, Carolin Feldmann, Alejandro F Frangi, Peter M Full, Bram Van Ginneken, Allan Hanbury, Katrin Honauer, Michal Kozubek, Bennett A Landman, Keno März, Oskar Maier, Klaus Maier-Hein, Bjoern H Menze, Henning Müller, Peter F Neher, Wiro Niessen, Nasir Rajpoot, Gregory C Sharp, Korsuk Sirinukunwattana, Stefanie Speidel, Christian Stock, Danail Stoyanov, Abdel Aziz Taha, Fons Van der Sommen, Ching-Wei Wang, Marc-André Weber, Guoyan Zheng, Pierre Jannin, Annette Kopp-Schneider
Publication date
2018/12/6
Journal
Nature communications
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
5217
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK
Description
International challenges have become the standard for validation of biomedical image analysis methods. Given their scientific impact, it is surprising that a critical analysis of common practices related to the organization of challenges has not yet been performed. In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of biomedical image analysis challenges conducted up to now. We demonstrate the importance of challenges and show that the lack of quality control has critical consequences. First, reproducibility and interpretation of the results is often hampered as only a fraction of relevant information is typically provided. Second, the rank of an algorithm is generally not robust to a number of variables such as the test data used for validation, the ranking scheme applied and the observers that make the reference annotations. To overcome these problems, we recommend best practice guidelines and define open …
Total citations
20182019202020212022202320245255055707830