Authors
Daniel Houser, Erte Xiao, Kevin McCabe, Vernon Smith
Publication date
2008/3/1
Journal
Games and Economic Behavior
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
509-532
Publisher
Academic Press
Description
People can become less cooperative when threatened with sanctions, and previous research suggests both “intentions” and incentives underlie this effect. We report data from an experiment aimed at determining the relative importance of intentions and incentives in producing non-cooperative behavior. Participants play a one-shot investment experiment in pairs. Investors send an amount to trustees, request a return on this investment and, in some treatments, can threaten sanctions to enforce their requests. Decisions by trustees facing threats imposed (or not) by investors are compared to decisions by trustees facing threats imposed (or not) by nature. When not threatened, trustees typically decide to return a positive amount less than the investor requested. When threatened this decision becomes least common. If the request is large relative to the sanction then most trustees return nothing. If the request is small …
Total citations
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024611161918182412211816101312912106
Scholar articles