Authors
Elizabeth Hoffman, Kevin A McCabe, Vernon L Smith
Publication date
1996/9
Source
International Journal of Game Theory
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
289-301
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Description
In an ultimatum game, player 1 makes an offer of $X from a total of $M to player 2. If player 2 accepts the offer, then player 1 is paid $(M-X) and player 2 receives $X; if player 2 rejects the offer, each gets zero. In the ultimatum game experiments reported in the literature,M is typically not more than $10 (see Forsythe, Horowitz, Savin and Sefton, 1994, hereafter FHSS; Hoffman, McCabe, Shachat and Smith, 1994, hereafter HMSS, and the literature cited therein). We report new results for 50 bargaining pairs in whichM=$100, and compare them with previous outcomes from 48 pairs withM=$10. The need for an examination of the effect of increased stakes on ultimatum bargaining is suggested by a literature survey of the effect of varying the stakes in a wide variety of decision making and market experiments over the last 33 years (Smith and Walker, 1993b). Many cases were found in which the predictions of …
Total citations
19951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202455101092316172120562322282523274131183527202017102014157
Scholar articles
E Hoffman, KA McCabe, VL Smith - International Journal of Game Theory, 1996