Authors
Mark D Rogerson, Michael C Gottlieb, Mitchell M Handelsman, Samuel Knapp, Jeffrey Younggren
Publication date
2011/10
Source
American Psychologist
Volume
66
Issue
7
Pages
614
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Description
Most current ethical decision-making models provide a logical and reasoned process for making ethical judgments, but these models are empirically unproven and rely upon assumptions of rational, conscious, and quasilegal reasoning. Such models predominate despite the fact that many nonrational factors influence ethical thought and behavior, including context, perceptions, relationships, emotions, and heuristics. For example, a large body of behavioral research has demonstrated the importance of automatic intuitive and affective processes in decision making and judgment. These processes profoundly affect human behavior and lead to systematic biases and departures from normative theories of rationality. Their influence represents an important but largely unrecognized component of ethical decision making. We selectively review this work; provide various illustrations; and make recommendations for …
Total citations
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241326262414212319132291413
Scholar articles
MD Rogerson, MC Gottlieb, MM Handelsman, S Knapp… - American Psychologist, 2011