Authors
Courtney C Moreno, Pardeep K Mittal, Patrick S Sullivan, Robin Rutherford, Charles A Staley, Kenneth Cardona, Natalyn N Hawk, W Thomas Dixon, Hiroumi D Kitajima, Jian Kang, William C Small, John Oshinski, John R Votaw
Publication date
2016/3/1
Journal
Clinical colorectal cancer
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
67-73
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
Introduction/Background
Rates of colorectal cancer screening are improving but remain suboptimal. Limited information is available regarding how patients are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (for example, asymptomatic screened patients or diagnostic workup because of the presence of symptoms). The purpose of this investigation was to determine how patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (screening colonoscopy, diagnostic colonoscopy, or emergent surgery) and tumor stage and size at diagnosis.
Patients and Methods
Adults evaluated between 2011 and 2014 with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer were identified. Clinical notes, endoscopy reports, surgical reports, radiology reports, and pathology reports were reviewed. Sex, race, ethnicity, age at the time of initial diagnosis, method of diagnosis, presenting symptom(s), and primary tumor size and stage at diagnosis were recorded. Colorectal cancer …
Total citations
2015201620172018201920202021202220232024161419262031323012