Authors
Olaf Morgenstern, MA Giorgetta, K Shibata, Veronika Eyring, DW Waugh, TG Shepherd, H Akiyoshi, J Austin, AJG Baumgaertner, Slimane Bekki, P Braesicke, C Brühl, MP Chipperfield, David Cugnet, Martin Dameris, S Dhomse, SM Frith, Hella Garny, Andrew Gettelman, SC Hardiman, MI Hegglin, Patrick Jöckel, DE Kinnison, J‐F Lamarque, E Mancini, E Manzini, Marion Marchand, M Michou, T Nakamura, JE Nielsen, D Olivié, G Pitari, DA Plummer, E Rozanov, JF Scinocca, Dan Smale, H Teyssèdre, Matthew Toohey, W Tian, Y Yamashita
Publication date
2010/2/16
Source
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Volume
115
Issue
D3
Description
The goal of the Chemistry‐Climate Model Validation (CCMVal) activity is to improve understanding of chemistry‐climate models (CCMs) through process‐oriented evaluation and to provide reliable projections of stratospheric ozone and its impact on climate. An appreciation of the details of model formulations is essential for understanding how models respond to the changing external forcings of greenhouse gases and ozone‐depleting substances, and hence for understanding the ozone and climate forecasts produced by the models participating in this activity. Here we introduce and review the models used for the second round (CCMVal‐2) of this intercomparison, regarding the implementation of chemical, transport, radiative, and dynamical processes in these models. In particular, we review the advantages and problems associated with approaches used to model processes of relevance to stratospheric …
Total citations
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202418182224101312109775533
Scholar articles