Authors
Ashok Agarwal, Damayanthi Durairajanayagam, Sindhuja Tatagari, Sandro Esteves, Avi Harlev, Ralf Henkel, Shubhadeep Roychoudhury, Sheryl Homa, Nicolás Garrido Puchalt, Ranjith Ramasamy, Ahmad Majzoub, Kim Dao Ly, Eva Tvrda, Mourad Assidi, Kavindra Kesari, Reecha Sharma, Saleem Bani Hani, Edmund Ko, Muhammad Abu‑Elmagd, Jaime Gosalvez, Asher Bashiri
Publication date
2016
Journal
Asian Journal of Andrology
Volume
18
Pages
296-309
Description
Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publishes in peer-reviewed, indexed, high impact journals. This essential yardstick, often referred to as the impact of a specific researcher, is assessed through the use of various metrics. While researchers may be acquainted with such matrices, many do not know how to use them to enhance their careers. In addition to these metrics, a number of other factors should be taken into consideration to objectively evaluate a scientist's profile as a researcher and academician. Moreover, each metric has its own limitations that need to be considered when selecting an appropriate metric for evaluation. This paper provides a broad overview of the wide array of metrics currently in use in academia and research. Popular metrics are discussed and defined, including traditional metrics and article-level metrics, some of which are …
Total citations
2016201720182019202020212022202320241714294546779010984
Scholar articles
A Agarwal, D Durairajanayagam, S Tatagari… - Asian journal of andrology, 2016