Authors
Luisa Gehle, Michael Hameleers, Marina Tulin, Claes de Vreese, Toril Aalberg, Peter Van Aelst, Ana S Cardenal, Nicoleta Corbu, Patrick van Erkel, Frank Esser, Denis Halagiera, David Hopmann, Karolina Koç-Michalska, Jörg Matthes, Christine Meltzer, Sergio Splendore, James Stanyer, Agnieszka Stępińska, Václav Štětka, Jesper Strömbäck, Ludovic Terren, Yannis Theocharis, Alon Zoizner
Publication date
2024/9/1
Journal
International Journal of Public Opinion Research
Volume
36
Issue
3
Publisher
Oxford Academic
Description
It can be difficult for citizens to discern factually accurate information from mis-and disinformation. Particularly in the context of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the omnipresence of counterfactual narratives, propaganda, and partisan content may increase the likelihood that citizens select and accept mis-or disinformation. To assess citizens’ performance in discerning false statements from factually accurate information on the war, we utilized original survey data across 19 countries (N= 19,037) with soft quotas for age, education, and gender to approximate population characteristics. Our main findings indicate that people perform relatively well in discerning factually accurate information from false statements and that self-perceived media literacy and the need for cognition corresponds with better performance. Stronger pro-Russia views on the war correspond with a lower performance in misinformation detection …
Total citations
Scholar articles