Authors
Erik Nelson, Guillermo Mendoza, James Regetz, Stephen Polasky, Heather Tallis, DRichard Cameron, Kai MA Chan, Gretchen C Daily, Joshua Goldstein, Peter M Kareiva, Eric Lonsdorf, Robin Naidoo, Taylor H Ricketts, MRebecca Shaw
Publication date
2009/2
Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
4-11
Publisher
Ecological Society of America
Description
Nature provides a wide range of benefits to people. There is increasing consensus about the importance of incorporating these “ecosystem services” into resource management decisions, but quantifying the levels and values of these services has proven difficult. We use a spatially explicit modeling tool, Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to predict changes in ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, and commodity production levels. We apply InVEST to stakeholder‐defined scenarios of land‐use/land‐cover change in the Willamette Basin, Oregon. We found that scenarios that received high scores for a variety of ecosystem services also had high scores for biodiversity, suggesting there is little tradeoff between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services. Scenarios involving more development had higher commodity production values, but lower levels of biodiversity …
Total citations
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024388211516721022522926422023923318920620217270
Scholar articles