Authors
Cam Donaldson, Rachel Baker, Helen Mason, Michael Jones-Lee, Emily Lancsar, John Wildman, Ian Bateman, Graham Loomes, Angela Robinson, Robert Sugden, Jose Luis Pinto Prades, Mandy Ryan, Phil Shackley, Richard Smith
Publication date
2011/12
Journal
BMC health services research
Volume
11
Pages
1-8
Publisher
BioMed Central
Description
Background
Since the inception of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in England, there have been questions about the empirical basis for the cost-per-QALY threshold used by NICE and whether QALYs gained by different beneficiaries of health care should be weighted equally. The Social Value of a QALY (SVQ) project, reported in this paper, was commissioned to address these two questions. The results of SVQ were released during a time of considerable debate about the NICE threshold, and authors with differing perspectives have drawn on the SVQ results to support their cases. As these discussions continue, and given the selective use of results by those involved, it is important, therefore, not only to present a summary overview of SVQ, but also for those who conducted the research to contribute to the debate as to its implications for NICE …
Total citations
2010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241312151915121196135453
Scholar articles
C Donaldson, R Baker, H Mason, M Jones-Lee… - BMC health services research, 2011