View article

Phylogenetic analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences were used to test a recent phylogenetic hypothesis for the avian genus Gallicolumba that relied heavily on preserved museum study skins for DNA samples. Our comparisons show that several published gene sequences represent pseudogenes or chimeras of multiple taxa, and these sequences had an adverse influence on phylogeny estimation. A new phylogenetic hypothesis strongly supports the monophyly of Philippine bleeding-hearts, the monophyly of Gallicolumba sensu stricto, and places Leucosarcia as part of an Australasian radiation rather than sister to Alopecoenas. These findings clarify Gallicolumba biogeography and also highlight the need for greater caution in the use of suboptimal source material in molecular systematic studies.