View article

1. 3.4 11.2-. 518-. 288 10.8-. 528 2. 4.9 16.1-. 413-. 222 15.6-. 422 3............................. 6.7 22.0-. 316-. 153 21.3-. 327 4..... 8.9 29.2-. 222-. 076 28.3-. 232 5. 11.5 37.7-. 125+. 009 36.6-. 137 6. 14.0 46.8-. 032. 101 44.6-. 054 7. 11.3 56.8+. 068. 210 55.1+. 051 8. 20.4 67.0. 177. 337 65.0. 155 9. 23.1 75.5. 282. 467 73.6. 256 10. 25.1 82.3. 385. 602 79.9. 345 1. 26.9 88.3. 506. 767 85.. 7. 448 12. 28.4 93.0. 647. 965 90.4. 561 13. 29.5 96.8. 850 1.272 93.9. 683 14. 29.9 98.1. 986 1.455 95.2. 747 15. 30.2 98.8 1.103 1.657 96.2. 803 16. 30.0 98.4 1.030 1.518 95.5. 764 17. 30.0 98.4 1.030 1.518 95.5. 764 18. 31.3- i-- 99.7 1.452 bData from Anderson and Ander through at least its lower half, the equation is appropriate; continue with step (e). If the relationship is curved through the whole range of values the equation will not fit the growth data closely and step (c) must be repeated using a different equation.(e) If the graph of the …