Authors
Leaf Van Boven, Phillip J Ehret, David K Sherman
Publication date
2018/7
Journal
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
492-507
Publisher
Sage Publications
Description
Psychological scientists have the expertise—and arguably an obligation—to help understand the political polarization that impedes enactment of climate policy. Many explanations emphasize Republican skepticism about climate change. Yet results from national panel studies in 2014 and 2016 indicate that most Republicans believe in climate change, if not as strongly as Democrats. Political polarization over climate policy does not simply reflect that Democrats and Republicans disagree about climate change but that Democrats and Republicans disagree with each other. The results of a national panel experiment and of in-depth interviews with four former members of Congress suggest that Democrats and Republicans—both ordinary citizens and policymakers—support policies from their own party and reactively devalue policies from the opposing party. These partisan evaluations occur both for policies …
Total citations
20182019202020212022202320246213954504222
Scholar articles
L Van Boven, PJ Ehret, DK Sherman - Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2018