Authors
Andrés Cruz-Herranz, Lisanne J Balk, Timm Oberwahrenbrock, Shiv Saidha, Elena H Martinez-Lapiscina, Wolf A Lagreze, Joel S Schuman, Pablo Villoslada, Peter Calabresi, Laura Balcer, Axel Petzold, Ari J Green, Friedemann Paul, Alexander U Brandt, Philipp Albrecht, IMSVISUAL consortium
Publication date
2016/6/14
Source
Neurology
Volume
86
Issue
24
Pages
2303-2309
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Description
Objective
To develop consensus recommendations for reporting of quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) study results.
Methods
A panel of experienced OCT researchers (including 11 neurologists, 2 ophthalmologists, and 2 neuroscientists) discussed requirements for performing and reporting quantitative analyses of retinal morphology and developed a list of initial recommendations based on experience and previous studies. The list of recommendations was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group.
Results
We provide a 9-point checklist encompassing aspects deemed relevant when reporting quantitative OCT studies. The areas covered are study protocol, acquisition device, acquisition settings, scanning protocol, funduscopic imaging, postacquisition data selection, postacquisition data analysis, recommended nomenclature, and statistical analysis.
Conclusions
The …
Scholar articles
A Cruz-Herranz, LJ Balk, T Oberwahrenbrock… - Neurology, 2016