Authors
Jonathan D Cheng, James Hitt, Bogda Koczwara, Kevin A Schulman, Caroline B Burnett, Darrell J Gaskin, Julia H Rowland, Neal J Meropol
Publication date
2000/1/1
Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
421-421
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology
Description
PURPOSE: Quality of life (QOL) is increasingly recognized as a critical cancer-treatment outcome measure, but little is known about the impact of QOL on the patient decision-making process. A pilot study was conducted in an effort to (1) measure the expectations of patients, physicians, and research nurses regarding the potential benefits and toxicities from experimental and standard therapies, and (2) determine the relationship of QOL to patient perceptions regarding treatment options.
METHODS: Thirty cancer patients enrolling in phase I clinical trials, their physicians, and their research nurses were administered questionnaires that assessed demographics, QOL, and treatment expectations.
RESULTS: Compared with their physicians, patients overestimated potential benefits and toxicities from experimental therapy (mean expected benefit, 59.8% v 23.8%, P < .01; mean expected toxicity, 29.8% v 16.0%, P …
Total citations
2001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241210107161010712866107646114521
Scholar articles
JD Cheng, J Hitt, B Koczwara, KA Schulman… - Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2000