Authors
Arthur A Stone, Saul Shiffman, Joseph E Schwartz, Joan E Broderick, Michael R Hufford
Publication date
2003/4/1
Journal
Controlled clinical trials
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
182-199
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
Paper diaries are commonly used in health care and clinical research to assess patient experiences. There is concern that patients do not comply with diary protocols, possibly invalidating the benefit of diary data. Compliance with paper diaries was examined with a paper diary and with an electronic diary that incorporated compliance-enhancing features. Participants were chronic pain patients and they were assigned to use either a paper diary instrumented to track diary use or an electronic diary that time-stamped entries. Participants were instructed to make three pain entries per day at predetermined times for 21 consecutive days. Primary outcome measures were reported vs actual compliance with paper diaries and actual compliance with paper diaries (defined by comparing the written times and the electronically-recorded times of diary use). Actual compliance was recorded by the electronic diary. Participants …
Total citations
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320247162144505351485061575075764761616568614022
Scholar articles
AA Stone, S Shiffman, JE Schwartz, JE Broderick… - Controlled clinical trials, 2003