Authors
Chris Evans, Janice Connell, Michael Barkham, Frank Margison, Graeme McGrath, John Mellor-Clark, Kerry Audin
Publication date
2002/1
Journal
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Volume
180
Issue
1
Pages
51-60
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Description
BackgroundAn acceptable, standardised outcome measure to assess efficacy and effectiveness is needed across multiple disciplines offering psychological therapies.AimsTo present psychometric data on reliability, validity and sensitivity to change for the CORE–OM (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation – Outcome Measure).MethodA 34-item self-report instrument was developed, with domains of subjective well-being, symptoms, function and risk. Analysis includes internal reliability, test–retest reliability, socio-demographic differences, exploratory principal-component analysis, correlations with other instruments, differences between clinical and non-clinical samples and assessment of change within a clinical group.ResultsInternal and test–retest reliability were good (0.75–0.95), as was convergent validity with seven other instruments, with large differences between clinical and non-clinical samples and good …
Total citations
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320243872029192827284051646475817585789491778150
Scholar articles