Authors
Matthew G Betts, Christopher Wolf, Marion Pfeifer, Cristina Banks-Leite, Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez, Danilo Bandini Ribeiro, Jos Barlow, Felix Eigenbrod, Deborah Faria, Robert J Fletcher Jr, Adam S Hadley, Joseph E Hawes, Robert D Holt, Brian Klingbeil, Urs Kormann, Luc Lens, Taal Levi, Guido F Medina-Rangel, Stephanie L Melles, Dirk Mezger, José Carlos Morante-Filho, C David L Orme, Carlos A Peres, Benjamin T Phalan, Anna Pidgeon, Hugh Possingham, William J Ripple, Eleanor M Slade, Eduardo Somarriba, Joseph A Tobias, Jason M Tylianakis, J Nicolás Urbina-Cardona, Jonathon J Valente, James I Watling, Konstans Wells, Oliver R Wearn, Eric Wood, Richard Young, Robert M Ewers
Publication date
2019/12/6
Journal
Science
Volume
366
Issue
6470
Pages
1236-1239
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science
Description
Habitat loss is the primary driver of biodiversity decline worldwide, but the effects of fragmentation (the spatial arrangement of remaining habitat) are debated. We tested the hypothesis that forest fragmentation sensitivity—affected by avoidance of habitat edges—should be driven by historical exposure to, and therefore species’ evolutionary responses to disturbance. Using a database containing 73 datasets collected worldwide (encompassing 4489 animal species), we found that the proportion of fragmentation-sensitive species was nearly three times as high in regions with low rates of historical disturbance compared with regions with high rates of disturbance (i.e., fires, glaciation, hurricanes, and deforestation). These disturbances coincide with a latitudinal gradient in which sensitivity increases sixfold at low versus high latitudes. We conclude that conservation efforts to limit edges created by fragmentation will be …
Total citations
20192020202120222023202422954445238