Authors
CB Knox, Kelsi Furman, Antonie Jetter, Steven Gray, Philippe J Giabbanelli
Publication date
2024/1/30
Book
Fuzzy Cognitive Maps: Best Practices and Modern Methods
Pages
19-44
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Description
Research design for FCM studies involving people is not always linear. Several decision factors can take priority over each other, such as identifying whose knowledge to represent, how the data will be collected, and the best process for what they are going to represent. In this chapter, we focus on matching the study goals or research questions with the context of the study and who the participants are and how (or if?) you have access to them to collect FCMs. The chapter starts by examining four significant choices for study design: (1) individual versus group modeling, (2) participant versus facilitator mapping, (3) hand-drawn models versus modeling software, and (4) pre-defined versus open-ended concepts. We explain advantages and disadvantages of common methods in the field for each of these aspects of study design, such that researchers can identify suitable methods for their application context. Then, we …
Total citations
Scholar articles
CB Knox, K Furman, A Jetter, S Gray, PJ Giabbanelli - Fuzzy Cognitive Maps: Best Practices and Modern …, 2024