Authors
William Runciman, Peter Hibbert, Richard Thomson, Tjerk Van Der Schaaf, Heather Sherman, Pierre Lewalle
Publication date
2009/2/1
Journal
International journal for quality in health care
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
18-26
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Description
Background
Understanding the patient safety literature has been compromised by the inconsistent use of language.
Objectives
To identify key concepts of relevance to the International Patient Safety Classification (ICPS) proposed by the World Alliance For Patient Safety of the World Health Organization (WHO), and agree on definitions and preferred terms.
Methods
Six principles were agreed upon—that the concepts and terms should: be applicable across the full spectrum of healthcare; be consistent with concepts from other WHO Classifications; have meanings as close as possible to those in colloquial use; convey the appropriate meanings with respect to patient safety; be brief and clear, without unnecessary or redundant qualifiers; be fit-for-purpose for the ICPS.
Results
Definitions and preferred terms were agreed for 48 concepts …
Total citations
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202411272237536268788273856953634123
Scholar articles
W Runciman, P Hibbert, R Thomson, T Van Der Schaaf… - International journal for quality in health care, 2009