Authors
David DeSteno, Monica Y Bartlett, Julia Braverman, Peter Salovey
Publication date
2002/11
Journal
Journal of personality and social psychology
Volume
83
Issue
5
Pages
1103
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Description
Two studies are presented that challenge the evidentiary basis for the existence of evolved sex differences in jealousy. In opposition to the evolutionary view, Study 1 demonstrated that a sex difference in jealousy resulting from sexual versus emotional infidelity is observed only when judgments are recorded using a forced-choice response format. On all other measures, no sex differences were found; both men and women reported greater jealousy in response to sexual infidelity. A second study revealed that the sex difference on the forced-choice measure disappeared under conditions of cognitive constraint. These findings suggest that the sex difference used to support the evolutionary view of jealousy (eg, DM Buss, R. Larsen, D. Westen, & J. Semmelroth, 1992; DM Buss et al., 1999) likely represents a measurement artifact resulting from a format-induced effortful decision strategy and not an automatic, sex …
Total citations
200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202471726212324222223263538341718242214131564
Scholar articles
D DeSteno, MY Bartlett, J Braverman, P Salovey - Journal of personality and social psychology, 2002