Authors
Maarten Boudry, Massimo Pigliucci
Publication date
2013/12/1
Journal
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
660-668
Publisher
Pergamon
Description
The scientific study of living organisms is permeated by machine and design metaphors. Genes are thought of as the “blueprint” of an organism, organisms are “reverse engineered” to discover their functionality, and living cells are compared to biochemical factories, complete with assembly lines, transport systems, messenger circuits, etc. Although the notion of design is indispensable to think about adaptations, and engineering analogies have considerable heuristic value (e.g., optimality assumptions), we argue they are limited in several important respects. In particular, the analogy with human-made machines falters when we move down to the level of molecular biology and genetics. Living organisms are far more messy and less transparent than human-made machines. Notoriously, evolution is an opportunistic tinkerer, blindly stumbling on “designs” that no sensible engineer would come up with. Despite …
Total citations
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202436678912101283
Scholar articles
M Boudry, M Pigliucci - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C …, 2013