Authors
Joshua Farley, Daniel Baker, David Batker, Christopher Koliba, Richard Matteson, Russell Mills, James Pittman
Publication date
2007/8/1
Journal
Ecological economics
Volume
63
Issue
2-3
Pages
344-354
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
Ecological economics and its allied trans-disciplinary fields are well established in academia, but so far have failed to have significant influence on policy makers. Public policy research and theory suggest that three process streams must converge in order to shape the political agenda and change policy [Kingdon, J. 1984. Agenda, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.]. First, the “problem” stream emerges when an existing condition is defined as a problem – a discrepancy between current reality and a desired goal – and critical policy makers accept the definition of the problem. The “policy” stream emerges as consensus grows around policy instruments to solve the problem. The “politics” stream emerges as the “national mood” and leading politicians accept the gravity of the problem and are willing to implement the policies required to address it. When these three streams converge, a policy …
Total citations
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024341626118487811108784
Scholar articles
J Farley, D Baker, D Batker, C Koliba, R Matteson… - Ecological economics, 2007