Authors
Herbert W Marsh, Bengt Muthén, Tihomir Asparouhov, Oliver Lüdtke, Alexander Robitzsch, Alexandre JS Morin, Ulrich Trautwein
Publication date
2009/7/14
Journal
Structural equation modeling: A multidisciplinary journal
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
439-476
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Group
Description
This study is a methodological-substantive synergy, demonstrating the power and flexibility of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) methods that integrate confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses (CFA and EFA), as applied to substantively important questions based on multidimentional students' evaluations of university teaching (SETs). For these data, there is a well established ESEM structure but typical CFA models do not fit the data and substantially inflate correlations among the nine SET factors (median rs = .34 for ESEM, .72 for CFA) in a way that undermines discriminant validity and usefulness as diagnostic feedback. A 13-model taxonomy of ESEM measurement invariance is proposed, showing complete invariance (factor loadings, factor correlations, item uniquenesses, item intercepts, latent means) over multiple groups based on the SETs collected in the first and second halves of a 13 …
Total citations
2010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241945446473818971981051051289812057
Scholar articles
HW Marsh, B Muthén, T Asparouhov, O Lüdtke… - Structural equation modeling: A multidisciplinary …, 2009