View article

Vaccination has been a crucial factor in the fight against COVID-19 because of its effectiveness in suppressing virus circulation, lowering the risk of severe disease, and ultimately saving lives. Many countries with an early and rapid distribution of COVID-19 vaccines performed much better in reducing their total number of deaths than those with lower coverage and slower roll-out pace. However, we still do not know how many more deaths could have been averted if countries with slower vaccine roll-outs followed the same rate as countries with earlier and faster distribution of vaccines. Here, we investigated counterfactual scenarios for the number of avertable COVID-19 deaths in a given country based on other countries’ vaccine roll-out rates. As a case study, we compared Iran to eight model countries with similar income brackets and dominant COVID-19 vaccine types. Our analysis revealed that faster roll-outs were associated with higher numbers of averted deaths. While Iran’s percentage of fully vaccinated individuals would have been similar to Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Turkey under counterfactual roll-out rates, adopting Turkey’s rates could have averted up to 50,000 more deaths, whereas following Bangladesh’s rates could have led to up to 52,800 additional losses of lives in Iran. Notably, a counterfactual scenario based on Argentina’s early but slow roll-out rate resulted in a smaller number of averted deaths in Iran, up to 12,600 more individuals. Following Montenegro’s or Bolivia’s model of faster per capita roll-out rates for Iran could have resulted in more averted deaths in older age groups, particularly during the Alpha and …