View article

In multi-lateral negotiations, parties can use their power (political, military, economic, etc.) to affect the final outcome of the game. In these games which are usually asymmetric, due to uneven powers of the negotiators, players seek reaching their most preferable outcome for which they can gain support from the other players. Conventional conflict resolution methods do not consider the power of negotiators as an element of the analysis. Here, we propose a method for studying multilateral asymmetric negotiations. This method considers the power of the negotiator as a determining factor in finding the final resolution. The proposed method is applied to find the most likely outcome of an international water conflict which has remained unresolved since 1993. In this game, five costal countries have been negotiating over the legal status of Caspian Sea without reaching any success, resulting in tragedy of the commons …