Authors
Robert L Wilby, TML Wigley, D Conway, PD Jones, BC Hewitson, J Main, DS Wilks
Publication date
1998/11
Journal
Water resources research
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
2995-3008
Description
A range of different statistical downscaling models was calibrated using both observed and general circulation model (GCM) generated daily precipitation time series and intercompared. The GCM used was the U.K. Meteorological Office, Hadley Centre's coupled ocean/atmosphere model (HadCM2) forced by combined CO2 and sulfate aerosol changes. Climate model results for 1980–1999 (present) and 2080–2099 (future) were used, for six regions across the United States. The downscaling methods compared were different weather generator techniques (the standard “WGEN” method, and a method based on spell‐length durations), two different methods using grid point vorticity data as an atmospheric predictor variable (B‐Circ and C‐Circ), and two variations of an artificial neural network (ANN) transfer function technique using circulation data and circulation plus temperature data as predictor variables …
Total citations
199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241626242221324037424839415962556353746543495142463821
Scholar articles