Authors
Gary L Wells, Amina Memon, Steven D Penrod
Publication date
2006/11
Journal
Psychological science in the public interest
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
45-75
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Description
The criminal justice system relies heavily on eyewitnesses to determine the facts surrounding criminal events. Eyewitnesses may identify culprits, recall conversations, or remember other details. An eyewitness who has no motive to lie is a powerful form of evidence for jurors, especially if the eyewitness appears to be highly confident about his or her recollection. In the absence of definitive proof to the contrary, the eyewitness's account is generally accepted by police, prosecutors, judges, and juries.
However, the faith the legal system places in eyewitnesses has been shaken recently by the advent of forensic DNA testing. Given the right set of circumstances, forensic DNA testing can prove that a person who was convicted of a crime is, in fact, innocent. Analyses of DNA exoneration cases since 1992 reveal that mistaken eyewitness identification was involved in the vast majority of these convictions, accounting for …
Total citations
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202462439344259434648434143323844252613
Scholar articles
GL Wells, A Memon, SD Penrod - Psychological science in the public interest, 2006