Authors
Gary L Wells, Mark Small, Steven Penrod, Roy S Malpass, Solomon M Fulero, CA ELIZABETH Brimacombe
Publication date
1998/12
Journal
Law and Human behavior
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
603
Publisher
Springer
Description
There is increasing evidence that false eyewitness identification is the primary cause of the conviction of innocent people. In 1996, the American Psychology/Law Society, Division 41 of the American Psychological Association, appointed a subcommittee to review scientific evidence and make recommendations regarding the best procedures for constructing and conducting lineups and photospreads. Three important themes from the scientific literature relevant to lineup methods were identified and reviewed, namely relative-judgment processes, the lineups-as-experiments analogy, and confidence malleability. Recommendations are made that double-blind lineup testing should be used, that eyewitnesses should be forewarned that the culprit might not be present, that distractors should be selected based on the eyewitness's verbal description of the perpetrator, and that confidence should be assessed and recorded …
Total citations
19981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202451719313644354965567263555285966976706048486348583614
Scholar articles
GL Wells, M Small, S Penrod, RS Malpass, SM Fulero… - Law and Human behavior, 1998