Authors
Brad J Schoenfeld, Jozo Grgic, Dan Ogborn, James W Krieger
Publication date
2017/12/1
Source
The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
3508-3523
Publisher
LWW
Description
Schoenfeld, BJ, Grgic, J, Ogborn, D, and Krieger, JW. Strength and hypertrophy adaptations between low-vs. high-load resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 31 (12): 3508–3523, 2017—The purpose of this article was to conduct a systematic review of the current body of literature and a meta-analysis to compare changes in strength and hypertrophy between low-vs. high-load resistance training protocols. Searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were conducted for studies that met the following criteria:(a) an experimental trial involving both low-load training [≤ 60% 1 repetition maximum (1RM)] and high-load training (> 60% 1RM);(b) with all sets in the training protocols being performed to momentary muscular failure;(c) at least one method of estimating changes in muscle mass or dynamic, isometric, or isokinetic strength was used;(d) the training …
Total citations
20162017201820192020202120222023202434328511213215515981
Scholar articles