Authors
Ben C Scheele, Sarah Legge, Wade Blanchard, Stephen Garnett, Hayley Geyle, Graeme Gillespie, Perter Harrison, David Lindenmayer, Mark Lintermans, Natasha Robinson, John Woinarski
Publication date
2019/7/1
Journal
Biological Conservation
Volume
235
Pages
273-278
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
Monitoring threatened species is essential for quantifying population trends, understanding causes of species' declines, and guiding the development and assessment of effective recovery actions. Here, we provide a systematic, continental-scale evaluation of the extent and quality of monitoring for threatened species, focussing on terrestrial and freshwater vertebrates in Australia. We found marked inadequacies: one in four threatened taxa are not monitored at all; for taxa that are monitored, monitoring quality, as assessed across nine metrics, was generally low. Higher quality monitoring was associated with policy recognition, in the form of species recovery plans, and for species having a more imperilled conservation status. Across taxonomic classes, the proportion of species monitored was highest for mammals and then birds, whereas monitoring quality was greatest for birds. Improving monitoring quality …
Total citations
20202021202220232024118211911
Scholar articles