Authors
Elizabeth E Crone, Eric S Menges, Martha M Ellis, Timothy Bell, Paulette Bierzychudek, Johan Ehrlén, Thomas N Kaye, Tiffany M Knight, Peter Lesica, William F Morris, Gerard Oostermeijer, Pedro F Quintana‐Ascencio, Amanda Stanley, Tamara Ticktin, Teresa Valverde, Jennifer L Williams
Publication date
2011/1
Source
Ecology letters
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Description
Ecology Letters (2011) 14: 1–8
Abstract
Matrix projection models are among the most widely used tools in plant ecology. However, the way in which plant ecologists use and interpret these models differs from the way in which they are presented in the broader academic literature. In contrast to calls from earlier reviews, most studies of plant populations are based on < 5 matrices and present simple metrics such as deterministic population growth rates. However, plant ecologists also cautioned against literal interpretation of model predictions. Although academic studies have emphasized testing quantitative model predictions, such forecasts are not the way in which plant ecologists find matrix models to be most useful. Improving forecasting ability would necessitate increased model complexity and longer studies. Therefore, in addition to longer term studies with better links to environmental drivers, priorities for …
Total citations
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024515292327382024201618202211
Scholar articles
EE Crone, ES Menges, MM Ellis, T Bell… - Ecology letters, 2011