Authors
Marc L Decramer, Kenneth R Chapman, Ronald Dahl, Peter Frith, Gilles Devouassoux, Carlos Fritscher, Ray Cameron, Muhammad Shoaib, David Lawrence, David Young, Danny McBryan
Publication date
2013/9/1
Journal
The lancet Respiratory medicine
Volume
1
Issue
7
Pages
524-533
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
Background
We compared the efficacy and safety of indacaterol and tiotropium in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a history of at least one moderate to severe exacerbation in the previous 12 months.
Methods
In this multicentre, randomised, blinded, double-dummy, parallel group study, we enrolled patients aged 40 years or older with severe COPD and at least one exacerbation within the previous year. We used a computer-generated sequence to randomly allocate patients (1:1; stratified by baseline inhaled corticosteroid use, with the balance of treatments maintained at country level) to receive either indacaterol (150 μg) or tiotropium (18 μg) once-daily for 52 weeks. Our primary and key secondary objectives were to investigate whether indacaterol was non-inferior to tiotropium for trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at week 12 (primary endpoint), and for rate of …
Total citations
201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202413203040664728282114138